Good racism? Is there such a thing? Yes, I think so. Here are the dictionary.com definitions of racism, which I think are themselves discriminatory and bigoted.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism : 1-3

1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
    
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
    
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

In answer to the above three definitions:

I don’t consider it a belief, but a scientific fact as per arbitrary yet universally held ideals of human morality and success... My good racism is not doctrinaire. Again, another dictionary.com definition, for doctrinaire:

“1. A person who tries to apply some doctrine or theory without sufficient regard for practical considerations; an impractical theorist.”

The impractical part of my practice of this spreading of good racism is the automatic tags of hater and nazi, and its waste of expression and threats of job loss, etc..

Back to racism

1. It is not merely a “belief” that there are inherent differences among various human races that determine an overall gap in cultural and individual achievement among these groups, but a certain fact that doesn’t require my belief, and yes, this greater group breeds superiority, and the “right” to rule others should be a matter of free competition and meritocracy not affirmative actionocracy, and hopefully not what Einstein said:

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." Like a PLANET OF THE APES scenario?, but with the whites actually being the great minds as opposed to them in the movie where they were wild, mute and stupid...

I remember what April said about being a racist, she is the mother of the Prussian Blue girls:

http://www.eluid.org/news/prussian-blue.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_Blue_(American_duo)

April, when asked if she was a racist, said something about if racism merely means acknowledging difference between races, then yes. I agree. But of course the usual interpretation of racist is bigot, irrational, prejudice, nazi, hater, etc... and not rational, learned, wise and understanding. If anyone could demonstrate to me the advantage of 40 million negros in America compared to 40 million Japanese folks or 40 million Germans, then I will no longer be a racist. You can’t. So celebrate exclusivity, the elite – to celebrate diversity is to celebrate indirectly the potential for victimization of the elite, such that blacks disproportionately victimize nonblacks for instance.

2. There need not be a policy or government intervention, the cream of the crop will naturally rise to the top. Fostering good racism is more a matter of allowing the natural and inevitable process of evolution, and as such there is a considerable statistically significant difference between groups/races/colors – discrimination’s best synonym is differentiation, like a discriminating palate can determine differences of chocolate... Yet we have had this kind of odds based recognition of differences made largely illegal through anti-discrimination laws.

3. Acknowledging racial differences and that some groups are more favorable than others requires no emotional content, no hate to realize these facts. There should be more intolerance of THE PLANET OF THE APES we have allowed, for instance:

Go to the BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS and find inter-racial homicide numbers year by year: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/ovracetab.htm

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/723/bureauirf.jpg

The Bureau of Justice link above doesn't work anymore, i wonder why, so i translated the info in order to imageshack it, a hosting website - it looks crappy, i have other versions and you may have to scroll horizontally to understand the columns of stats and what they stand for...

Here is a better one, as the one above just lists percentages, here are the hard numbers:

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/892/blackonwhitey.jpg

and yet another link which works unlike the above BJS link that they changed:

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/tables/ovracetab.cfm

I  believe this chart combines what I have before seen as two charts for both stranger homicides and acquaintance homicide tables and as such you will find that from 1976-2000 there have been almost 15,500 more whites killed by blacks in America than blacks killed by whites – this means that after you figure the equal number of cross-racial murders, the tit for tat, eye for eye, and its reverse, white on black and black on white, you have a negative sum of almost 15,500 (15,442) more dead whites; and figuring for relative equal populations you have had a kill ratio that has approached 18 dead whites at the hands of blacks (known as evil murdering niggers in this case) for each one dead black at the hands of whites (who might be trash, but also the white killing of blacks is more defensive than the reverse)... So this ratio takes into account a roughly 5 times greater white population compared to blacks, and the exact average ratio over this period I’m not sure of... something badly over 10 to one I’m sure...

The further deconstruction of this stat is even more appalling – simply by going forward and back in time, and with other considered variables like how many more hidden unsolved killings of whites by blacks do you have compared to the reverse?

It is a greater stigma to have a cross racial killing, almost as if it really is more acceptable within one’s own group, and I tire of hearing black on black crime, when black on white crime is more important, as whites are more important than blacks. And with this proven greater value of life I tire of the white on black beating or murder as far more a riot creating reaction among the Al Sharpton hoards compared to the reverse, black on white murder, which is hardly responded to by comparison – and seemingly never on racial lines of white focus/pride/protection. It seems whites haven’t had their black on white crime riot yet... You’d think 10s of thousands more dead might be some impetus?!

Given the above sample of stats, and many more with even much higher multiples of relative inter-racial crime rates, what will it take for segregation? What multiple or kill ratio must you see in order to then think segregation is valid/wise/good? - or at least the first home owner’s association that doesn’t allow negros in their white/asian or simply nonblack hood? I also think that due to lower Asian crime rates than whites, Asians can make a case for keeping out nonasians – its purely a matter of probability. And is all this extra killing of whites by blacks worth their integration?

What is the great benefit of diversity? In the case of negros, its hardly provable at all, and really quite the contrary unless you invoke your own subjective brand of esthetics. And this style of value interpretation can only be even more displaced and rendered irrelevant when you consider so many more forms of black on white crime; rape, theft, and other forms of violent victimization. You look at the math and then illustrate it in your mind – I’ve thought of a dead end street with 18 dead whites and one dead black, not to mention the thousands of equal dead whites and blacks that are equal in number only and all the more tragic considering I value black life less and consider the white on black killings as far more justified than the reverse...

I don’t have some zero-sum tit for tat idea of race, for if that were the case we could start by reversing the relative kill ratio for the last quarter century, and as such 15,500 negros would have to be killed right away, not to mention many thousands more for a broader time range – and then to achieve the relative 18 to one or so kill ratio we are talking WAR! Any war of revenge like this would also be guided by the predictable future – MORE VICTIMIZATION BY BLACKS, disproportionately and indefinitely, and I don’t just mean this as a cause or result of some white pride revenge war, but also just exclusively a function of this pattern and predictable evil future negros have for us all...

These black on white crime stats are not as you would expect it based purely on numbers and mammalian herd behavior, meaning that if one group is larger, like the roughly 5 times as many whites as blacks as we have in USA, with blacks accounting for almost 14% of the US population last I checked, you’d expect kill ratios to favor the much larger group – like in some massive war, or as a simple function of math – more whites around to kill blacks just by the odds of it, yet this logistical numbers realization doesn’t at all pan out, if anything it makes whites far more nice than if there were equal numbers of blacks and whites...

So as to some collective herd think mentality it is interesting that I’ve heard the following rates of gang membership per group in America, per capita ratio I believe; recently they have been 1. black 2. Hispanic 3. Asian 4. white, and yet even more recently I’ve heard/read that this has changed due to the massive waves of illegals, so it is estimated that Hispanics have recently played catch up with blacks? And much of Asian gang membership has been a matter of illegals... So in a sense there is not a herd enough collective behavior for whites to gang up on the rest of America, and certainly skinheads, rednecks and bikers have been in far greater disdain in the media for the longest time compared to other gangs, like in black American hip hop culture that has reached nearly worshipped status and is validated merely by the marketing for entertainment profit.

So I don’t call for some GET REVENGE anti-nigger war, as much as those fantasies have held my thinking when, for example, I see Reginald Denny getting nearly killed by sadistic and celebratory riot nigs of LA, but I do believe gun laws should be much more NRAish and constitutionally outlaw states like Massachusetts, Illinois and Wisconsin should allow their citizens easier access to guns. Vermont is more like it, open carry law, no need to apply for permission to have the rights the constitution outlined and enforced for us, as per the 2nd amendment.

http://www.amazon.com/More-Guns-Less-Crime-Understanding/dp/0226493636

MORE GUNS LESS CRIME is the book linked above.

http://www.thoseshirts.com/diversity.html

I can only hope this above shirt has the all too subtle message I hope it does – an answer to “diversity” and its result/reaction, or really need of self defensive!

Eugenics: One of the last times I saw this covered in the news was a Barbara Walters program many years ago and she almost instantly went into some connection of the nazi attempt at eugenics as an introduction to the issue. How can good genetics be bad?, only by some guilt by association as the baby of WWII is thrown out with the bathwater – meaning too much of the Third Reich was thrown out as evil nonsense.

With almost a 70% illegitimacy rate among blacks in America, this alone proves a lack of worthiness for them to breed, not to mention brain size, IQ, longevity, disease of lifestyle rates, genetic diseases, crime rates, etc...

RACE, EVOLUTION AND BEHAVIOR is a book that outlines much of this racial difference.

http://www.amazon.com/Race-Evolution-Behavior-History-Perspective/dp/096...

and here is a watered down and more concise abridged free version:

http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf

I like to call this book by Rushton, THE BELL CURVE part II.

So in sum, good racism accounts for a more successful lifestyle management based on the predictable odds of racial differences, such that THOU SHALT NOT BREED WITH NEGROS could be the 1st commandment and THOU SHALT MAINTAIN DISTANCE FROM NEGROS as a second?, - as much as possible?, and as much as we have a liberal easy policy on crime, in so far as you are innocent until proven guilty, this legal tenet is less effective with negros, THE LEAST EFFECTIVE with negros, such that more anarchy and vigilante justice is in order for them compared to nonblacks, otherwise they will continue to victimize nonblacks disproportionately because our laws and punishments are too easy on the criminal-predator, the nigger.

And yes, I know, nonblacks commit crime, but get your priorities straight, focus on the pit bull before the Pomeranian. And profiling is used as a reason blacks have higher crime rates. Simply look at “crime reported by victim” stats, the pattern holds, blacks are the worst by far! So you can’t dispel the idea of blacks being more evil/stupid/animal as myth – it is proven many times over.

Reparations: blacks owe America, nonblacks deserve reparations from blacks. First and foremost for a better breed of slavery, as longevity shot up from around 20 years life expectancy in Africa, pre-middle passage, to around 35 in the new world (America) during the antebellum south days. There are so many other reasons blacks owe America, and the gifts of white culture to black culture, simply by blacks being able to utilize it in ANY capacity makes this THE relatively greatest of all standard of living increase for Africans since Africa started churning out black folks! In sum, its mud huts to central air. Why they deserve equality is totally amazing to me, yet there is some explanation of some equality in terms of public perception and the worth of blacks over time – breeding:

As I’ve read twice over the years, some 89-90% of black Americans have some white genetic material in them, and this accounts for something over 15% white genetic material on average per black, as per a study of 10 US cities and around 1000 DNA samples, about 100 blacks per city... This white gift accounts for a nice boost in IQ, such that black African IQ is around 70 minus and about 85 in America. There is also the speculation that the more selfish surviving white genes disproportionately displaced black genes during black and white breeding combos and that any percentage increase of white into the black gene pool also is over-represented in terms of IQ increase – meaning, a little white goes along way for a black, BUT still not far enough. I wouldn’t want it to go farther for black benefit, because it is a waste of white genetic material – a throw away that gives “black” people more credit than they deserve and stifles a greater potential of achieving a white/white brilliant offspring...

They use our extra IQ to further their black agenda, and how white can you still be and be considered black in America?! This is amazing to me. Why is Obama black? Because blacks will take anybody, to use a quote from a black guy who I asked about this, and whites are still apprehensive about any amount of black in someone, like one 16th laws under Jim Crow, as in the fraction of someone needing black in them to be considered black. Perhaps it is also the generous white idea of granting a so called “black” person their “black” success, even though it is disproportionately a measure of their white genetic material...

The pattern holds when you look at the blackest, they are the dumbest as per a .92 correlation of color darkness to low IQ, 1.00 being perfect correlation. This is amazingly connected as the two variables largely hold this pattern globally, even among other darkies, like in Asia, not just a white/black thing. The .08 difference favors blacks in terms of expected IQ, meaning that they actually do a bit better than their expected model would predict, meaning that a 1.0 coefficient would mean an equal linear parallel between units of IQ and color – for each unit increase in darkness of skin the IQ drops per given equal unit of comparison. I have a hard time believing it is this correlated, I shall study more on this, but there is some peer review journal empirical data on this matter that really deserves more comprehensive interpretation than I have above... in any case, the gap is considerable, blacks are the dumbest on earth by far, and even this most criticized process of judging one by their color is actually highly accurate, statistically more than I expected upon running into this empirical data...

http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/article_intelligence/t3.asp

Check out table 4 as well on the above link, fun stuff! VDARE has stated the world average IQ as 90. And don’t give me the often quoted 100 as average, I’ve had enough of that. The test was designed with 100 being an arbitrary average, WITHOUT the whole world taking the initial test in order to come up with an average. So ideally you create a test with no score for the world to begin with and then BELL CURVE the whole world, and that is your average, at the top of the bell curve. Instead we largely have a test that shows white average IQ with most of the rest of the world being dumber. East Asians do better than whites, especially the Japs; they may be the smartest on earth as a country average and Ashkenazi Jews are the smartest people on earth. 112-117 IQ average, and as low as 107, but I think these lower averages, even lower than 107 or 110, border on anti-semitism, yet Sephardic and Ashkenazi differences are considerable and should be accounted for and not averaged together for the higher averages I list – not to mention Jews being all over the world and multi-racial. Euro-Jews are the smartest, and by extension euro-Ashkenazi Jews in America.

Weirdly STORMFRONT largely doesn’t consider Jews white, and a large minority of these fools have fallen into a poll trap on that site stating that all Jews are evil, a grossly stupid broad stroke of judgment – I don’t remember the exact percent, but it was from 100s of pollers I think, over or around quarter of them or so... Something amazingly bad, EVEN for STORMFRONT, and I say this even as much as I appreciate much of their stuff!

This came from STORMFRONT:

The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the jew.
- Adolf Hitler

That may be true, but not ALL JEWS ARE EVIL... duh!
But of course, by the odds of it, the most evil person must be a jew? Or in all likelihood?

I just wrote the above 2 lines, the Hitler quote was what I was talking about from SF.

It is such a response, of all Jews being evil, that can earn the GOOD RACIST a bad name, because of obvious reasons, namely that there is good in all of humanity, especially when you are talking about millions in a group, and yet I’d say the most good comes from euro-whites, and more specifically NW euros, alright, and maybe even the French? – a little joke. Or should I have said?: “maybe even the Irish?”, actually that is more the accurate question, even though I’m 30.25% Irish and the CELTIC TIGER seems to have emerged many years ago...

Back to negros:

http://niggermania.com/tom/niggerarguments/niggerargumentstext.htm

The above is not exhaustive scholarship but makes some great points along with some research. The dick size thing is a lie and merely a marketing ploy to target market richer whites for their penis enlargement program. These bigger weiner plans are all bull crap I believe and yet get away with it, because who would want to sue?! Imagine the case in court and the judge asks you to repeat, “Did you say you wanted to enlarge your penis from ONLY 4 inches!?” (snickers in court, muffled laughter...).

Blacks do have the largest dicks, not whites like this lie of an advertisement used as white propaganda by Tom Shelly of niggermania...

I've seen enough evidence of bigger black dicks in the real peer review journal material, and not from weiner enlargement adverts - which i think are target marketed to smaller dicked and richer whites?  So lets end this lovely intro with a dick size summation:

"Thus, the human penis shows high species-specificity as an elaborated
genital structure. Penis size also varies moderately across
populations, being largest among African populations, smaller among
European populations, and smallest among East Asian populations, but
with substantial overlap (Rushton, 1987, 1988b, 1989b)

Don't believe the equalizer PC uniters of race, who want to try to resolve the issue by dismissing it with no science.  Its logically impossible for there to be no difference, in the case of any quantifiable phenomena.  You can try to argue the difference is insignificant...  See if any of these PC liars will say that blacks have equal sized dicks with asians.  Between asians and blacks there is a significant difference, while whites are in between.

Dick size leads into an argument of animality, as i'll call it - the bigger the more the animal you are...  and yes, blacks are closer to animal than the rest of we humans.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SEPTEMBER 5TH, 2008 (the above written some days and weeks before)

Now as to VDARE, New Nation, Amren., ACLU... and the Jew news, this is something my techman put up - he is more jew critical than i am.  In fact due to my great appreciation of IQ, with Ashkenazi jews having the highest IQs in the world, i am not such a jew basher/baiter - so i have complained about this section of news to my techman, who says he will do away with all these temporary news sections eventually. 

I've almost sent money to VDARE.  I've attempted getting help from the ACLU at least a few times as to my squelched political activism and 1st amendment loses, to no avail.  I have enjoyed Amren and the rebalancing of media exposure that a New Nation provides, etc...  But to cast constant aspersions and scorn on the elite of man is folly to me - jews can make or break us more than any other group on earth.  I just like to think the higher IQ the greater the morality, which is provable up to a point, and yet makes me wonder as to jews with all the propaganda out there, like they are more evil per unit of IQ?  I doubt it.  Extreme success and survival is seen as too aggressive and even evil to some, and when any one group is hounded overtime they will be more aggressive in their survival overtime - so, in a sense the perception of evil in others perpetuates evil in others simply by our response to them and vice versa, and our collective treatment of them (jews).  In a sense we have created this great surviving smart people by western civilization's long term treatment and hounding of them - like a drill sergeant or coach pushing you to your otherwise ignored limits.  And unlike these two jock examples jews have pushed themselves to educational limits beyond any other...

IQ is the single best variable as a correlation for all the goods of man: longevity, education, income, success, morality, behavior, etc...  Of course there are exceptions, but the pattern holds and high IQ is really causative for the best of mankind...

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

September 22, 2008

I googled GOOD RACISM and found 3 links above my website.  This one i found to be most worthy:

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/racism-and-why-good-43915...

And this brings up the topic of symbology and nazis and KKK and who in history and now use these icons/isms to promote racism.  Specifically with respect to the STORMFRONT link is the totenkopf (deaths head) used as the avatar of this post, an SS symbol in case you didn’t know – that’s Waffen SS (Nazis), and this leads to another more funny link:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15702868/

Its at least some victory that such a symbol could make its way through the politically correct filter of consumerism as a pop culture icon of white pride? Of course WWII was a huge Aryan on Aryan battle in large measure, but because the Nazis took enough of a racial stand it is the likes of this Stormfront poster, and myself to some degree, that in seeing the emasculation of the white man in recent decades we can still turn to some bit of history, no matter how controversial, to feel awakened, inspired and call upon at least some model of reaction to counter this bad racist lefty trend against those who are most responsible for history’s advances (white men), as explained somewhat by Kommano88 of Stormfront on 11-22-2007.

So in some sense a newer understanding and feel for nazi symbology is that it is used to counter negro crime, the ethnic cleansing of whites, and hatred against white pride, such that there is more unity racially now than during WWII when sadly the “allies” didn’t get with the program – but white people are understanding more and more as they watch their culture and history get erased, sadly as they silently stand by being too afraid of being marked a racist for speaking up against their own annihilation.

WHAT IS RACISM?

I found the following article dealing with this years ago on STORMFRONT, but here it is again in a far more colorful and interesting way:

http://seanbryson.com/articles/what_is_racism.html

The bad racism against whites is the worst form, because to lose white potential is to lose the greatest potential of man’s advance, and this may beg another question: So racism against blacks is not as bad? Its not as costly. In other words, without trying to rationalize or justify it, to oppress those who are already at the bottom is less of a loss of potential. And again, as per the above site, which I guess has anti-semite stuff, I think to oppress jews because they are too successful is to hinder progress, at least for jews!

I do wish jewish identity could be less insular and more widely secular and approachable, such that they don’t act out their success in so narrow a group think manner, which I think may largely be the case – I’m not much for ZOG conspiracies other than the realization that jews do have more power per capita of jew than any other on earth...

The jewish identity is so strong because they have survived and lasted so long with a constant measure of challenge throughout history, and nothing causes you to self-identify, look at yourself, and wonder why you are receiving oppression more than war and bad racism acted out against you, or good racism as some would argue against jews...

The constant focus on who and what you are overtime leads to more stubborn identity issues of group inclusiveness and exclusivity while leaving out others, otherwise a more eclectic flow of identity over time can take place as we find peace in other cultures and ways of living, but if you always feel like the outsider and oppressed by the “others” you will not be so inclined to adapt their identity, unless you are totally oppressed and lose the war totally. Jews have always had a historical outlet in history, never being totally eradicated, and have been hounded enough to actually help them stubbornly stick to who and what they are... So I argue a dynamic of jews and others kind of grouping in history to explain even mere jewish existence – in a sense, if they were never bothered they might well have mixed into roman god worship, zoraster, allah, odin, etc... and I say this with the realization that as to religion: they all seem to be just as infinitely impossible and absurd with all their god talk – like any god will do as to the level of silliness of it. So really the god/religion that wins in history is the mark of warfare victories, and not some REAL god or meaningful reality that is taking over due to its truth and cosmic glory that will in the end win – no, stupidity is winning, and this slows evolution, and much like Kommano88 says: evolution will quicken if ALL OF HUMANITY can cherish whites as much as whites SHOULD now cherish themselves (as I add and extend Kommano’s remarks)...

How can nonwhites cherish their elite white masters more than themselves? I have often found respect for others in their greater skill in whatever – chess, running, money, diet, etc... I don’t see why this can’t be extended to race in realizing group differences and a better mastery of life among some of us as opposed to say... (just for kicks), Pygmies? 54ish IQ!, maybe the very dumbest people on earth. Again, you can consult Richard Lynn for these IQ stats...

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

October 6th, 2008

As to jews again, and in thinking of the idea (fact?) that they are disproportionately evil relative to IQ...  IQ to me has meant the single best correlate of indication for all the goods of man - success, longevity, behavior, culture... but in writing some of the above and thinking about it later i was reminded of a researcher at UF who told me about jewish genetic disease, and particularly those that deal with lipid processing in the brain - and jews have these brain problems more than most... and as such this serves at least as some kind of biological deterministic factor in the so called evil jew syndrome.  It could explain how they could be more evil relative to having high IQ as compared to other groups of similar/same IQ having less crime in their group... 

A similar comparison i've speculated on is the very high, if not hightest, alcoholic rates in Ireland (Poland may be highest presently)... Ireland, especially west ireland, has the highest rates of insanity in the world - schizophrenia, and as such i've theorized that the drinking maybe a kind of self medication of sorts...  Could success in the jews be a function of dysfunction?  A measure of instigated biochemistry in thinking?  It could be like genius Daniel Tammet says, that there is a surprisingly thin line between disability/dysfunction and genius - meaning that developmental instability and what usually causes damage can also be the spark of human survival and invention for those few whose bio system has responded positively.  Like a horse spur to its side can cause it to run faster? 

Most of these things (damage/instability) are really just that - damage and instability creating a below average human, but Nietzsche's dictum of THAT WHICH DOESN'T KILL ME MAKES ME STRONGER can apply, such that in the case of the jew, there may be an extra measure of success and IQ as compensation for and reaction to "faulty" lipid processing in the brain.  Faulty in that it can create biologically determined evil jews?, and really not so faulty when it serves as an instigator of Nietzsche's quote as our evolutionary process can achieve these more positive outcomes even despite seeming environmental and internal chemical conditions that usually predict otherwise.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

December 14,2008

VALKYRIE, the tom cruise movie about the attempted assassination of HITLER is opening XMAS day…? I wonder why… What could this mean? So have a Merry Hitler Christmas?

Tom Cruise is great at playing dicks and assholes, maybe because he is one to some degree? Anyway, one of history’s king racists will be partially blown up july 20, 1944 (xmas day 2008). Should be interesting… Its not really a war film, but more of a thriller and I hope well done for history’s sake… I relish this chance at dechristmasizing the tradition of Christmas by going to this film on xmas day…

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

1-20-09

Obama's first day is nearly up and i've questioned why he is called an african american so much, as i voiced this so much today at work, like thats the highlight of his presidency and not that he is the most qualified, which he isn't, regardless of your stand on the issues and political platforms...

So why isn't Obama known as a European African American or European American?  So your genetic origin as to continent of isolation is dictated by skin tone?  Somewhat, but in Obama's case only half...  Its a case of bad racism on both white and black racial counts, bad because blacks will take anyone in their group as long as there is some black and give credit for their smarts as being african and black, and ignoring the european mixture at least by name, and bad for whites because whites will shy away from giving Obama credit for smarts due to white genetic material or that white is ruined by black and thus concede a half breed as just black or african american, giving another warm body over to the all too accepting black collective...   

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

4-14-09

http://www.eugenics.net/papers/quotes.html


I found this quote at the above link, also, scroll down to the bottom of this page to get to the home page.

“The real advantage which truth has, consists in this, that when an opinion is true, it may be extinguished once, twice, or many times, but in the course of ages there will generally be found persons to rediscover it, until some one of its reappearances falls on a time when from favorable circumstances it escapes persecution until it has made such head as to withstand all subsequent attempts to suppress it.” - John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)

Of course I use good racism as the context for truth here…

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

5-7-09

In the mail days ago I received a nice signed letter of thank you and welcome from:

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/

- having donated $35 to them

- putting my money where my cyber typing mouth is

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

3-15-10

Alright, its been too damn long since i've thrown in some good racism on this page... what ever shall i say?  Did Tiger Woods "chimp out" or shall we blame his whole "Cablinasian" mixture? (CA - caucasian/ BL - black/ IN - indian/ and asian is from his mom who is half thai and half chinese, so tiger is quarter and quarter these two lines and not sure of the percents for the white-black-indian from his dad... In any case he is a proven nigger now, and i use black to account for the most sexual of the three main races as asians have the least amount of sex and whites are in between... Blacks have the worst AIDS rates, etc... worst disease rates in general, both behavioral and genetic...

Ok, i just blew it, i mentioned an easy pop culture newsy story that should be trumped by something more important...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zyMcCkK8ko

the above link: that’s a nice little tidbit for the race deniers… and from one of the all time LONG lived and bright biological evolutionists of the last century, and into this one by 5 years… too bad such old school thinkers have been witch hunted out of existence, like DNA fame WATSON wimping out (as I have put on this site his OTHER previous comments that I’m sure he REALLY believes as opposed to his PC retractions that followed… which I did not include at the bottom of good racism’s pages…

8-10-10

Ok, its been too damn long once again, but what does it matter, my site ain't too popular anyway...

So have you heard of the great humanitarian Albert Schweitzer?:

Albert Schweitzer published his "African Notebook" in 1939, an excerpt:

"I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There
is something that all white men who have lived here like I must learn and
know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the
intellectual, mental, or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally
with white men in any function of our civilization. I have given my life
to try to bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but
I have become well aware that we must retain this status: the superior and
they the inferior. For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as
their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will
destroy all of his work. Let white men from anywhere in the world, who
would come to Africa, remember that you must continually retain this
status; you the master and they the inferior like children that you would
help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as
your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you."

--- and look at the timing, published this in 1939, the year the white man really started killing himself (9-1-1939: Blitzkrieg into Poland signaled what many believe to be the starting point of WWII.)

 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

2-26-11

Seems like the above quote is BS, some stupid propaganda so obviously targeting the most famous humanitarian helper of blacks in africa?  Well, close i would imagine:

http://www.schweitzer.org/index.php?option=com_simplelists&view=simplelist&layout=toggle&category_id=84&Itemid=56&lang=en#rasist

http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=24708

So if the idea of the two above links holds merit then the only thing to do is to see if they used POLITICALLY CORRECT censorship by editing out the above quote from Albert's German version, but i think this is highly unlikely - this quote seems to be quite bogus, but you never really know until you do all of your homework - they did, after all, quite recently took out 219 "niggers" and even the word "injun" out of Mark Twain's classic... In any case, the body counts and black on white crime is telling enough, as this could be seen as prophecy become true - even if quite falsely attributed to Schweitzer...

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

6-15-11

Well after about 2.5 years on utube, after having a channel murdered by PC lib whiners, i got the following pop up today before i could even use utube again:

"ATTENTION

Text comments you posted to YouTube have been identified as containing hate speech, and have been deleted from the site.

Your account has received one Community Guidelines warning strike, which will expire in six months. Additional violations may result in the temporary disabling of your ability to post content to YouTube and/or the termination of your account."

 

- and then i had to click on : "I ACKNOWLEDGE" to use utube at all, it was my first strike but they pulled some functionality out of my account as i can't post comments on others channels, and maybe likewise on mine - for two weeks or 6 months, as they have broken their own rules which i looked up i don't know... so i think i broke this rule, and boy is it weak - and look how they pay weak lip service to free speech and then create a very open ended censorship guideline:

"We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view. But we don't permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, and sexual orientation/gender identity)."

- thats so pathetic, wimpy pansy candy ass PC sensitivity... I've always thought SCIENCE should get equal if not far more protection under such a mandate/guideline of equal protection... and why not protect pacifists more than veterans, we obviously know who needs protection more from others... i could go on and on... its so silly its sick.

Here is the email they sent me:

YouTube | Broadcast Yourself™

Regarding your account: (i've removed the channel name: i'd rather this be anonymous, for obvious reasons, yet i really don't care if people do find out about me in some creepy investigation stalking situation - i'll be as open and honest as i've been on this website)

"Text comments you posted to YouTube have been identified as containing hate speech, and have been deleted from the site.

Your account has received one Community Guidelines warning strike, which will expire in six months. Additional violations may result in the temporary disabling of your ability to post content to YouTube and/or the termination of your account.

Sincerely,

The YouTube Team"

---Now isn't that all silly?  Maybe it was the black on white murder rates and body counts i finally put on my channel... not sure...